Trump’s Taiwan ‘negotiating chip’ remark sparks alarm over how far he’d shift US-China policy

President Donald Trump suggested Friday that U.S. arms sales to…

Powering Progress: Inside Chevron’s Role in Meeting America’s Energy Needs

Meet the people and projects helping deliver reliable energy, as…

Steve Hilton gives brutal reality check to California gubernatorial rival

Steve Hilton filmed a video at a San Jose park…

The Biggest Moment Of The Rousey-Carano Fight Wasn’t The Knockout

This article is part of Upstream, The Daily Wire’s new home for…

Trump eyes new White House lawn project that could reshape presidential travel

President Donald Trump is reportedly considering installing a White House…

Gen Z Isn’t Lost. We’re Looking For A Conservatism That Works.

As a member of Gen Z, I am often told…

California GOP bill targets horrifying online cult, closes state ‘loophole’ on child extortion

A panel of California lawmakers on Tuesday advanced state legislation…

Biden judge halts ‘surprising’ illegal alien minor repatriation plan after advocacy groups sue

A Biden-appointed federal judge abruptly blocked the Trump administration from…

Trump orders Netanyahu to stop attacking Iran’s gas, oil fields

President Trump claimed Thursday he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin…

From Zapruder to smartphones: assassination footage reshapes America’s view of political violence

When President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in 1963, it…

Jackson protests as Supreme Court uses Louisiana gerrymandering ruling to instruct lower courts

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson protested the Supreme Court’s decision to use their recent ruling in a Louisiana gerrymandering case to instruct lower courts on how to define the Voting Rights Act, a move that could wipe out previous legal victories for voting rights groups.The Court on Monday sent a Mississippi case back down to U.S. District Court “for further consideration” following their ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which rejected race-based gerrymandering.”This case presents only the question of Section 2’s private enforceability, which our decision in Louisiana v. Callais … did not address,” Jackson dissented, referencing Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. “Thus I see no basis for vacating the lower court’s judgment.”This is a developing news story; check back for updates.